Conversion vs generation — they're not the same thing
People use "image to pixel art converter" to mean two completely different things. Worth clarifying before you pick a tool.
Conversion takes an existing image — a photo, illustration, screenshot, whatever — and reduces it to a pixel grid. It's algorithmic. The tool downsamples your image, snaps colors to a limited palette, and outputs something that looks pixelated. The result depends entirely on what you feed it.
Generation creates pixel art from scratch based on a text description. There's no source image. You type "knight with a silver sword" and an AI builds it pixel by pixel. The result depends on the model and your prompt.
Both have their place. Conversion is great when you already have a reference image and want a pixel art version of it. Generation is better when you're starting from an idea, not a photo.
This post covers both — but conversion tools first, since that's probably why you're here.
Our free converter tool
Full disclosure: we built this one. Sprite AI's image to pixel art converter runs entirely in the browser — no uploads to a server, no account needed.
Drop in any image and it converts to pixel art at the resolution you pick. You control the output size (8x8 up to 128x128), so you get actual game-ready sprites, not some arbitrary resolution. The palette reduction happens automatically, but the colors stay surprisingly faithful to the original.
What I like about it compared to other converters: it's built for game developers. The output sizes match standard sprite dimensions. You're not getting a 400x400 "pixel art style" image — you're getting a 32x32 sprite you can actually use.
After converting, you can open the result in our pixel editor to fix anything the algorithm got wrong. Clean up stray pixels, adjust colors, whatever needs doing. And if you need the output as a vector, the PNG to SVG converter handles that.
Other converters worth trying
PixelIt
PixelIt is open-source and browser-based. It gives you sliders for pixel size and palette selection, including some popular retro palettes like PICO-8 and Game Boy. The real-time preview is nice — you see changes as you drag the sliders.
Downsides? The output resolution is tied to the pixel block size rather than a target sprite dimension. Getting exactly 32x32 takes some math. And there's no built-in editor for cleanup.
Pixel Art Village
Pixel Art Village takes a simpler approach. Upload, pick a style preset, done. Less control than PixelIt, but faster if you just want to see what your image looks like pixelated without fiddling with settings.
The presets are limited though. If you need specific output dimensions for a game engine, you'll struggle here.
PixelMe
PixelMe is specifically designed for avatars and portraits. Upload a face photo, get a pixel art portrait. It's surprisingly good at faces — better than general-purpose converters because it's trained specifically for that use case.
Not useful for game sprites or items. Strictly portraits and avatars.
AI generation as an alternative
Sometimes conversion isn't what you actually need. If your source image is a vague reference or you want something that doesn't exist yet, AI generation gets you there faster.
The difference shows in the results. A converter takes your photo of a knight figurine and makes it look pixelated. An AI generator takes "16x16 knight, silver armor, side view, game sprite" and creates something purpose-built for games — clean lines, transparent background, proper sprite proportions.
For game development specifically, generation usually wins. Your photos weren't designed as game sprites. The proportions are wrong, the poses are wrong, the detail level is wrong. Generation creates assets that are already thinking about those constraints.
That said, conversion is better when you need to match a specific reference closely. Character portraits from concept art, item designs from sketches, environment tiles from real textures. Conversion preserves what's already there.
Quality comparison
| Factor | Conversion | AI generation |
|---|---|---|
| Speed | Instant | 5-15 seconds |
| Cost | Free | Free tokens, then paid |
| Accuracy to reference | High | Varies by prompt |
| Game-ready output | Needs cleanup | Usually good |
| Transparent backgrounds | Depends on source | Built in |
| Consistent style | Depends on source | Prompt-controlled |
| Custom sizes (16x16, etc.) | Tool dependent | Yes |
| Batch processing | One at a time | One at a time |
Neither approach is universally better. The best workflow usually combines both.
The convert-then-refine workflow
Here's what actually works in practice for most game developers:
- Convert your reference — Drop your image into the converter at your target resolution
- Clean up in the editor — Open the result in the pixel editor to fix artifacts, adjust colors, and sharpen details the algorithm muddied
- Export in the right format — Need a vector? Run it through the PNG to SVG converter for scalable output
This three-step process gives you more control than pure AI generation while being faster than drawing from scratch. The converter handles the tedious downsampling work, and you spend your time on creative decisions instead.
Thing is, the algorithm will always produce some artifacts. Edges get messy. Colors bleed. Small details disappear. That's normal — it's reducing thousands of pixels down to a handful. The cleanup step isn't optional, it's part of the process.
When to use what
Use conversion when:
- You have a specific reference image to match
- You need a pixel version of existing concept art
- You're creating avatar portraits from photos
- You want to prototype a style quickly from screenshots
Use AI generation when:
- You're creating assets from scratch for a game
- You need transparent backgrounds and clean sprites
- You want consistent style across many assets
- Your "reference" is an idea, not an image
Use both when:
- You're building a full game asset library
- Some assets have references, others don't
- You want to convert reference images then refine with AI-informed edits
For most indie game projects, you'll use both approaches at different points. Convert your concept sketches early on, then generate the bulk assets with AI once you've established the style.
Try the converter
Fastest way to see if conversion works for your use case: open the tool, drop in an image, and check the result. Takes about 10 seconds.
If the output needs work, the pixel editor is right there. If conversion isn't giving you what you need, try generating from a description instead.
For more on pixel art workflows, check our guide to 16x16 sprite creation or Pixilart alternatives if you're comparing tools.
Related posts
Easy pixel art for beginners: Create your first sprite
Start creating pixel art today. Learn the fundamentals, create your first sprite, and discover tips that make pixel art easier than you think.
Isometric pixel art for games — grids, sprites, and tilesets
The isometric grid trips everyone up at first. Here's how to actually draw isometric sprites and tilesets that tile correctly in Unity, Godot, and GameMaker.
10 pixel art color palettes you can steal for your game
Copy-paste hex codes for 10 proven pixel art palettes. Each one includes use cases and examples so you stop wasting time picking colors.